Madrona

Home / Campaigns / Madrona

MadronaProject Name: Madrona

Project Location: Brea

Lead Agency:City of Brea

Threat: The project applicant proposes 162 hilltop houses on 369 acres.

Description of the Issues:Concerns include lack of compliance with city and state land use and zoning law, risk of wildfire, traffic impacts, biological impacts, loss of trails, excessive water use, proximity to an earthquake fault, impacts to Chino Hills State Park, and inadequate project access.

Lead Organization:Hills For Everyone

FHBP’s Position/Involvement:

  • The FHBP Board of Directors voted to oppose the project and signed on as a co-petitioner to the lawsuit in July 2014.
  • FHBP has written substantive comments and testified at numerous public hearings on the project.

Project History:

  • The State of Idaho appealed the case to the Fourth District Court of Appeal in January 2016, they lost in October 2017. Then, they appealed to the California Supreme Court in November 2017 and the petition for review was denied in January 2018.  The Superior Court, Judge Claster, will require the City of Brea to overturn the project approvals and Environmental Impact Report in the coming months.
  • A California Environmental Quality Act lawsuit was filed by Hills For Everyone with Friends of Harbors, Beaches and Parks, California Native Plant Society, and Sierra Club as co-petitioners in July 2014.
  • The project has gone through numerous iterations since 1999 and was grandfathered in under old zoning and General Plan rules which applied “flat land” zoning to the hillsides.

Next Decision:
The Supreme Court decision not to review the case means the October 2017 win at the Appellate Courts stands.  The project and its Environmental Impact Report will likely be overturned in Spring 2018.

Decision History:
The City of Brea voted in 4-1 in July 2014 to approve the project, including supportive votes from: Mayor Brett Murdock, Mayor Pro Tem Christine Marick, Councilmembers Roy Moore and Ron Garcia.  Only Councilmember Marty Simonoff voted to deny the project.